The Sermon Study Guide is here.
Revelation 14:1-13
January 28/29, 2012 • Portage First UMC
There’s nothing quite like the real thing. When something has the word “imitation” in its name, you know it’s probably not as good as the real thing. For instance—imitation bacon bits do not even compare to real bacon. Imitation vanilla flavoring is good—until you have real vanilla. And imitation jewelry may be cheaper, but it doesn’t look as good or last as long. There’s nothing quite like the real thing. When we first got our Wii, I played several of the sports games. And you know, I was a darned good pitcher on Wii Baseball, and I wasn’t even too bad at hitting. But I doubt I could have gone and tried out for the Gary Railcats based on my experience with Wii Sports. It’s an imitation. It deludes you into thinking you are better than or know more than you do about the sport. Same with Wii Fit when we added it to our library. I enjoyed the skiing games, especially the slalom. I got to where I could avoid hitting many of the gates, but that doesn’t mean I should go out and try out for the Olympics because I’ve never actually on a ski slope, only on a virtual one. I’d likely break every bone in my body on my first attempt to head down the slope.
Increasingly, we live in a virtual world. We send e-mail rather than letters (and we jokingly refer to letters as “snail mail”). We have chats rather than conversations. And we text rather than talk. We might have hundreds of friends on Facebook and still feel incredibly alone because we have substituted virtual community for real community. We’ve substituted reading status updates for getting to know someone. And, like true consumers, we take what we can get and fail to notice the real person behind the status. When it comes to relationships and to people, when did we become satisfied with the imitation rather than the real thing?
When it comes to God, when did we become satisfied with the imitation rather than the real thing? That’s the question John is asking as we come to what is, to many, the darkest part of the book of Revelation. For the last few weeks, we’ve been working our way through this strange and wondrous book, looking not necessarily for clues to the date of the end of the world, as many do, but to the message Jesus gave John as a way to encourage the church. Remember, this book is not roadmap to the end, but a revelation of Jesus Christ (1:1), of what’s like and who he is. Last week, we talked about Jesus being the one who is present with his followers through whatever the world throws at us. We had that image of the believers being sealed, marked as belonging to God. Now, as we move forward in the Revelation, we’re confronted with a choice between two kingdoms: the kingdom of the beast and the kingdom of God. And the question John has for each of us is a simple one: which kingdom will you choose?
These chapters, 12-14, contain fantastic visions—dragons, beasts, angels, demons, and a woman clothed with the sun. The story begins in chapter 12 with a cosmic version of Christmas. When we think of the Christmas story, we think of the story we read in Luke 2 and Matthew 1, with shepherds and wisemen and angels telling us not to fear. We think of baby in a feeding trough, of cries in the night. We think Nazareth and Bethlehem. But in the Revelation, John sees Christmas from heaven’s viewpoint. He sees “a woman clothed with the sun” (12:1) who is about to give birth; the woman represents Israel, the nation out of which Jesus came, and on a narrower scale, she represents Mary who was the mother of the Lord (Smith & Card, Unveiled Hope, pg. 151). And as she’s about to give birth, a dragon appears. The dragon is always representative of Satan, the accuser, the one who wants to destroy whatever God is doing. And so the dragon stands before the woman, determined to destroy her baby because he knows this baby is the hope of the world. It’s a dramatic scene. When the woman gives birth, the dragon reaches for the child, but the “child was snatched up to God and to his throne” (12:5). The child was protected by the Father. And the angels, rather than spouting the words “fear not,” go to war against the dragon. The battle rages on, but in the end, the dragon “was not strong enough,” so he is “hurled down” where he “leads the whole world astray” (12:7-9). The angels win the war, but battles still rage on. I’ve heard that compared to what happened on D-Day in World War II. That day, that battle, changed the course of the war. From that moment on, the Nazi powers were defeated. The war went on for a while, but the tide had turned. When Jesus came, John says, the war for humanity was won. Even though there are still battles that go on, the ultimate outcome has already been decided.
In the next two chapters, then, John sees how that works itself out. The dragon calls forth a beast, a creature so frightening that the people of earth cry out, “Who is like the beast? Who can wage war against it?” (13:4). Then there is a second beast, one who carries out the will of the first beast, who leads people astray—so much so that people are deceived. They offer their worship to this beast. The picture John is giving us here is one of imitation. The dragon is Satan (John is quite clear about that), and the two beasts demand worship and seek to have the dragon’s will done in the world. We have here an unholy trinity—a parody or a mocking of the Father, Son and Holy Spirit. Satan imitates God the Father (one is creator and one wants to be), the first beast imitates the Son (demanding worship that only belongs to Jesus), and the second beast imitates the Holy Spirit (the Spirit brings glory to God and the beast seeks to bring glory to the dragon).
That’s what John was experiencing in the Roman Empire. As we’ve been saying these last few weeks, this Revelation was written to seven churches in Asia Minor, all of whom were undergoing various kinds of persecution because of their faith in Jesus. In fact, the church around the empire was beginning to more and more feel the sting of persecution and sometimes even death because of “the word of God and the testimony of Jesus” (1:9). The rising religion in Rome was emperor worship. When the Christians would proclaim a God who “sits on the throne” and who “rules the world,” the Roman Empire would say, “No, the emperor sits on the throne and the emperor rules the world. The emperor is the son of God, triumphant over all.” And the church believed Rome got its power from Satan. Rome, with its arrogant belief in its own significance and its determination to turn political power into religious devotion, is the first beast in John’s vision, waging war against God’s people (13:7) because Rome demanded worship.
Closer even to the people than that were the local elites, the governors and city rulers, who did their best to copy Rome and enforce Rome’s laws. They were the ones who insisted you should worship Rome and the emperor, and to make sure you did, city after city competed with each other for the honor of building yet another temple dedicated to the emperor or to someone in the emperor’s family. The local elites were the second beast, the power and the structure that carries out the will of the first beast (Wright, Revelation for Everyone, pg. 120). It’s a parody, an imitation, meant to divert the people’s worship from God to Rome—because if you get someone’s worship, you’ve got their heart. If you get their heart, then they’re part of your kingdom. You’ve got them for good.
We may not be as quick to identify ours or any other government as the beast, and certainly, at least in our current culture, we’re not asked to worship the image of our leaders. But that doesn’t mean there aren’t unholy parodies we’re tempted and even expected to participate in. Richard Foster says the three things in our world we are most tempted to worship are money, sex and power. Our economic system, while based on free and open trade, calls us to give everything we have for the sake of getting more and more. Wealth is seen as the goal, the most desirable state, and if you don’t have wealth, we’re told, you should do whatever you can to pursue it. Money becomes an object of worship, and we’re not content until we have lots of it. The same is true of sex. We live in a sex-saturated society. Hollywood tells us that if you’re really going to be happy, you should worship sexual intimacy by sharing it with whomever and whenever you want. The idea that such an act is reserved for husbands and wives in the marriage covenant is seen as old fashioned, hopelessly out of touch. Media becomes the beast, and we worship at the shrine of sex. And then there’s power. We’re in the midst of an election year, and every night and day on our television sets we see the deep, deep desire for power—so candidates campaign for power, and they often do it by digging up dirt on the other candidates, which is just another way of grabbing power.
But power is not just worshipped on a national scale in a campaign year. James Bryan Smith tells about a trustees meeting in a church he knew where they were discussing a proposed building addition. There were strong feelings around the table, partly because church attendance had plateaued lately. Some felt it was because the current worship services were full—there was no more room for new people. And others felt it was because a new church down the road had taken in some members that had come from their church, and those folks believed it was because that church had a better building. At the center of the discussion was an architect who was on the committee. He had been working on some drawings and so the group was asking questions about the size of the building and how much it would cost and so on. At one point, one person spoke up and said, “What I want to know is this: can we build a building that will help us compete with the church down the road?” The architect paused and told them he would need a minute because he had to decide whether to answer that question from inside or outside the kingdom of God. Was competition the goal? Is competition a value of the kingdom of God (Smith, The Good and Beautiful Community, pgs. 65-66), or is it a beastly imitation? Do we sometimes choose (or even seem to prefer) the imitation? Do we worship money, sex and power—the beast—more than we do the one who is on the throne, the ruler over the true kingdom? That’s the question John is asking the church.
Now, before we can go any further, we need to deal with what is perhaps the most famous part of the book of Revelation. Revelation 13 says the second beast “forced all people, great and small, rich and poor, free and slave, to receive a mark on their right hands or on their foreheads, so that they could not buy or sell unless they had the mark, which is the name of the beast or the number of its name. This calls for wisdom. Let the person who has insight calculate the number of the beast, for it is the number of a man. That number is 666” (13:16-18). This is also usually associated with a person known as the Antichrist, a word that does not appear in Revelation. Antichrist is a word taken out of some of John’s other writings, and equated with the beast here in Revelation. But when John uses that word in his letters, he describes people who have left the Christian community, who have gone out from the church and who now deny Jesus as the Son of God (cf. 1 John 2:18-22; 4:3; 2 John 7). In fact, he says many antichrists have come. John is describing a spirit that seeks to lead people away from Jesus. That’s different than what he’s describing in Revelation, and it doesn’t apply to just one person at the end of time. Nor does the Beast, because what John sees is a system that demands worship. And the way that worship or allegiance or obedience is shown is through this mark or seal. In fact, again this is a sign of imitation. Remember how the children of God were marked or sealed by heaven? Now, those who follow the beast are also marked. This seal, this mark is a sign of who we have given our allegiance to. To understand it as a literal mark misses the point. We don’t understand the first mark on the children of God as a literal one; why is so much ink spilled trying to make this one into a tattoo or a computer chip or something else like that?
Still, using this number, lots of folks have tried to figure out who the beast, the so-called antichrist is. One thing the commentators are agreed upon is that this a code, although the “key” to the code appears to have been lost early because many of the early church fathers puzzled over this number also. What we do know is that in ancient languages, there weren’t numbers per se, so you used letters to represent numbers—every child who has struggled to learn Roman Numerals knows that. And so you could use numbers that represent specific names or words—it was a practice called “gematria” where numeric values are assigned to letters and then added up (Smith & Card 157). One ancient example of this is a piece of graffiti found on a wall in Pompeii that read, “I love her whose number is 545” (Barclay, The Revelation of John, Volume 2, pg. 100). You see, that way if she didn’t love you back you could claim it was some other 545! But as for 666, various people throughout history have had their names manipulated so as to add up to the magic number—people like Martin Luther, Napoleon, Oliver Cromwell, John Wesley, Hitler, various popes, as well as Roman emperors like Caligula and Domitian. I remember when I was in school that some preachers said Ronald Reagan was the beast because each of this names had 6 letters in them. To some, that seemed confirmed when he left office and moved to a house at 666 St. Cloud Road. Mrs. Reagan got the address changed to 668. Most scholars today, however, agree that 666 was a first-century way of referring to the emperor Nero Caesar. Whether in Greek, Latin or Hebrew, Nero’s name adds up to 666 (Mulholland, “Revelation,” Cornerstone Biblical Commentary, Vol. 18, pg. 521). To John’s churches, this one who was killing their brothers and sisters, this one who demanded worship—he was the living embodiment of evil. He was the beast.
But what about this language about the forehead or the right hand? Remember that the saints of God were marked on their foreheads back in chapter 7. Now, the followers of the beast are marked there or on their right hand. In first century Jewish understanding, the forehead was the seat of perception. It represents the place we decide to obey or not to obey. In Jesus‘ time, many Jews wore phylacteries, little boxes with Scripture in them, on their foreheads to remind themselves that they were the people of God. So marking the forehead, as both kingdoms do in this vision, indicates who we choose to obey—the beast or God. The right hand, again in first century Jewish understanding, was the hand of action, the hand by which you carried out your obedience. We see many places in the Bible where something is said to happen by the power of God’s right hand. So to be marked on the right hand means your behavior is being shaped by the beast. Forehead and hand—both are indicators of something much deeper, of whom you have chosen to follow, to obey. They represent our worldview and our lifestyle, and John says that, in the world, without that mark you can’t buy or sell. Certainly that was true in the first century, because as Christianity became an illegal religion in the Roman Empire, those who were Christians were banned from the marketplace. If you wouldn’t swear allegiance to or worship the emperor, there was no room for you in the public square. And don’t we find that sometimes to be true today as well? In a culture where tolerance is supposedly the highest virtue, the only ones excluded are those who dare to say Jesus is the way, the truth and the life. The only sin left is to claim to know the truth, and so we’re excluded more and more (Mulholland 525-527). If you’re not willing to act in an unethical way, you might not get that job. If you’re not willing to give your heart to the company, you might not work there long. And if you choose to become a Christian when your family has forbidden it, you might find yourself without a family, without a name, without a life.
The line is stark between the two kingdoms, and we are asked to choose. At the beginning of chapter 14, after all those dragons and beasts, John sees a different kingdom. He sees the Lamb—could there be a greater contrast to a dragon than a lamb? And with him are his followers—the same ones we saw in chapter 7—who are marked with “his name and his Father’s name written on their foreheads” (14:1). What sets these people apart from the others is the one they’ve chosen to follow which results in a different way of life. John understands that the whole dragon/beast thing is a lie, but when he sees these followers of the Lamb, he notices a big difference: “No lie was found in their mouths; they are blameless” (14:5). They live in a way that is different to the world. They live, as best as they can, the truth. They seek to live in a way that is consistent with that truth (Wright 126). So let’s take money, sex and power again. When money comes along, those who follow the lamb recognize that its promises of security and wealth are a lie, and so while they use money, they recognize themselves as stewards, not hoarders. Money is a tool. Sex they recognize as a beautiful gift of God for intimacy between husbands and wives. It’s not a way to manipulate or influence or something we use merely for our own pleasure, as if pleasure were the highest good. Our culture tells us a lot of lies in this area. Satan whispers to us, “It’s okay, it’s only a little thing, it won’t matter.” And power—we remember that the world’s picture of power is not Jesus’ picture. In fact, on the last night he was with his disciples, Jesus gave us a model no one expected. When the world would say, “Grab power and run with it,” Jesus knelt down to serve, to wash feet, and called his disciples to do the same (cf. John 13). The idea that power is all that matters is a lie, and the followers of the Lamb refuse to believe or live by a lie. Instead, they choose, no matter how difficult it is, to live holy lives. Paul put it this way: “God did not call us to be impure, but to live a holy life. Therefore, anyone who rejects this instruction does not reject a human being but God, the very God who gives you his Holy Spirit” (1 Thessalonians 4:7-8). And Peter says the same thing: “The day of the Lord will come like a thief. The heavens will disappear with a roar; the elements will be destroyed by fire, and the earth and everything done in it will be laid bare. Since everything will be destroyed in this way, what kind of people ought you to be? You ought to live holy and godly lives as you look forward to the day of God and speed its coming” (2 Peter 3:10-12).
Right after this vision of God’s kingdom, John sees an angel flying, spreading the “eternal gospel” to “every nation, tribe, language and people” (14:6). He hears a voice calling out the choice to those who will hear: “Fear God and give him glory…worship him who made the heavens, the earth, the sea and the springs of water” (14:7). The beast’s kingdom is described as “fallen” (14:8). And the choice is up to those who listen. The angel’s words are an important reminder for those of us who sometimes lose focus on spreading that gospel and instead become satisfied with religious activity. Sometimes we get need reminded that Jesus calls us to more than mere activity. As we’ve been doing all throughout this series, we’re telling the story of this church along with the story of those churches, and one of the biggest ways in the last year we’ve tried to be faithful to God in sharing the good news is through our outreach service, PF Hope. I’d like you to hear from one of those who has been working with that project from the beginning. Take a listen.
VIDEO: Kathryn Weatherby
Holy living is being captured by a vision rather than consumed by a task. And to do that we have to make our choice. There is no middle ground in this vision. We choose to stand on the side of God’s kingdom or the Beast’s kingdom. John sees the ultimate end of that choice: those who stand on the beast’s side find themselves tormented and on the wrong side of God’s fury (14:9-12). But those who choose God’s side, find “rest from their labor” (14:13). What we choose now has eternal consequences. And how we help those around us choose has eternal consequences. There is a line between the kingdoms—between the genuine and the imitation. The choice is clear.
Arguably one of the greatest hymnwriters of church history was Isaac Watts, who started writing hymns because the songs in the church of his day were boring, he thought. He wanted “new songs” for the church. And so he took the psalms and wrote them in new ways, celebrating Jesus in the psalms. One of his most famous writings is his adaptation of Psalm 98, which celebrates Christ’s return and his triumph over the beast and the powers of evil. The first verse goes like this:
To our almighty Maker, God,
New honors be address’d;
his great salvation shines abroad,
And makes the nations blest.
We don’t sing that verse anymore. In fact, the way we sing it, we begin in the middle of the hymn with the fifth verse:
Joy to the world; the Lord is come;
Let earth receive her King;
Let every heart prepare him room,
And heaven and nature sing.
Yes, “Joy to the World,” one of the most popular Christmas hymns, was written as a celebration not of Jesus’ first coming, but of his second. And that’s why the hymn ends with these hopeful and confident words:
He rules the world with truth and grace,
And makes the nations prove
The glories of his righteousness,
And wonders of his love.
Hopeful and confident and sung by those who have chosen to live on God’s side of the line between kingdoms. Jesus once asked, “When the Son of Man comes, will he find faith on the earth?” (Luke 18:8). He will, most certainly, but will he find us faithful here on earth? Where do you stand? What side of the line will you choose, and how will you then live? The choice is up to you. Let’s pray.