The Sermon Study Guide is here.
Matthew 2:1-18
December 25, 2011 • Portage First UMC
This past week, I was discussing Christmas being on a Sunday with a friend of mine—okay, so I was complaining a bit…just a bit. She was telling me her family’s plans for Christmas and I sort of sarcastically said, “Well, you know, I have to work on Christmas Day this year!” To which she promptly responded, “Well, where better to be than in God’s house celebrating his birthday?” And you know what? She was right. There is no better place to be this morning than in this place celebrating Jesus’ birth. This morning ought to be a morning of worship, of celebration, of joy, and there is, perhaps, no part of the Christmas story that reminds us more of that truth than the story of the Magi.
We’ve been on this journey for the last month, the journey from Nazareth through Ein Karem and to Bethlehem, walking with Mary and Joseph toward and through the birth of Jesus, and it’s been my prayer throughout this series that perhaps you have learned some new things, maybe seen the story in a new light, but more importantly, I pray that you’ve drawn closer to the baby of Bethlehem because you’ve been on this journey. For us, it’s taken a month. For Mary and Joseph, it took nine months initially, and really a lifetime. And for some other travelers, the journey to the baby took at minimum three months and some suggest as long as two years.
They are the Magi. We often call them “wise men” or “kings” and we usually assume there were three of them because there are three gifts—hence, the carol we just sang, “We three kings of orient are.” But Matthew calls them not kings or wise men. He calls them “magi,” a word that can refer to astrologers or to magicians. The best scholarship today says they were likely priests in a religion called Zoroastrianism, probably from Persia (modern-day Iran), and they were men who believed that the stars contained messages for humankind. They studied the stars in order to predict the future (Hamilton, The Journey, pg. 121); astronomy and astrology were not such separate professions in their day. At one time, their religion was among the largest in the world, having begun in Persia with a man named Zoroaster. Zoroaster taught that there is a constant war between good and evil, and that humanity’s job is to keep evil at bay by entertaining good thoughts, speaking good words and performing good deeds. Sometimes, that’s what people want to reduce Christianity to—just doing nice things. Zoroastrians believe that good will prevail in the end and that at the end of the world, the universe will be renovated and a savior will appear. Today, there are still somewhere around 200,000 followers of Zoroaster, though their prominence in Iran in modern times has been diminished by Islamic rule. But it was this interest in a savior at the end of time that most likely led these Magi to study the Jewish texts available to them, because much that was written there sounded similar to what they believed. The Jews also believed in a savior, a Messiah, who would come to save the world and bring an end to history. And so the Magi studied the stars along with Jewish and other religious texts to try to find out when that would take place.
In the year 7 BC, there were three times when the planets Jupiter and Saturn were close to each other in the night sky. Now that’s significant because Jupiter was considered the “royal” or kingly planet, and Saturn was sometimes thought to represent the Jewish people. The two of them close together could have caused a bright phenomenon in the sky, and if these Magi, studying the stars, saw that, what other conclusion could they draw except that a king had been born to the Jews? But regardless of what it was they actually saw, Matthew is clear that when it began, they noticed it and they set out to find what event on earth was signified by this unusual bright light in the heavens (Wright, Matthew for Everyone, Part One, pg. 10).
Now, assuming they set out the night they first saw the star, and assuming the star first appeared the night Jesus was born, they still would not have arrived at the manger along with the shepherds the way most of our nativity scenes and movies have them. If they were from Persia, as many believe, they would have had a thousand miles to travel. It would have taken them somewhere between three and six months to make that journey (Hamilton 121). Jesus was no longer in the manger when they arrived. In fact, Matthew says the family was living in a house, probably still staying with Joseph’s family in their house. That would have been the tradition anyway, for Joseph to have brought his new family into his family home.
So the Magi arrive somewhere between three months and maybe as long as two years after the birth. But they don’t go immediately to Bethlehem. When there is a new king of the Jews being born, where would you expect that baby to be? Not in a lesser-known suburb. No, the baby would be in the capital, of course. In Jerusalem, and so that’s where they go first and they ask the king at the time, Herod the Great, “Where is the one who has been born king of the Jews?” (2:2). “King of the Jews”—where has Herod heard that title before? Oh, yes! That’s his title. That’s the title Rome gave to him when he was appointed to rule over Judea. And it’s a title Herod was extremely protective of. Herod was more than a little paranoid. Whenever he perceived a threat to his kingdom, he would do whatever it took to eliminate that threat—whether the threat was real or not. He had numerous people killed, including three of his sons and his favorite wife Mariamne, because he was afraid they were plotting to take the throne from him. When we read the latter part of this morning’s passage, we learn Herod wasn’t above genocide, either, if it served his purposes. In order to try to kill this newborn so-called “king of the Jews,” he orders the execution of every male child under two years of age in Bethlehem. Granted, Bethlehem was a small village at the time, and it’s likely this “slaughter of the innocents” may have only been somewhere around a dozen or so children—that’s still a dozen or so too many, a dozen or so baby boys whose lives were taken from them because of Herod’s great paranoia (Hamilton 125).
So when the Magi come to Jerusalem, they approach the king, who then asks his chief priests and religious teachers about this king. They inform him that, according to the Scriptures, the savior would be born in Bethlehem, not in Jerusalem. They can even quote the exact passage from Micah that says so. And yet, I find it fascinating that even though Bethlehem is less than a day’s walk from Jerusalem, none of them—not the religious leaders or the king—are interested enough to go down to Bethlehem to find out if such a person, such a savior had been born. These Magi come to town, saying that the Jewish prophecy had been fulfilled, and the Jewish religious leaders and the king of the Jews sit tight in Jerusalem while the foreign pagan astrologers head on down the road toward Bethlehem. Those who worship a different god are more interested in finding out if the message of the Old Testament prophets is true than those who claim to have believed it all along.
And I don’t think things have changed all that much in 2,000 years. Very often, those of us who have heard it over and over are less likely to respond to it than are those who have never heard. Perhaps that’s why the church is growing in almost every part of the world except North America. As a culture, we’ve become almost immune to the good news of the gospel. We’re busy fighting wars over where you can place public nativity scenes instead of actually sharing the story in a way people can hear it. What I love about this Magi story is the way God shared the good news with them. He spoke their language, as he did to the shepherds as well. To them, God sent an angel with a promise that their messiah, their savior, had been born. But to these pagan astrologers, God used a star to communicate. Sometimes we get all worked up about how the good news is communicated. Can you use technology to tell the story? Can you use rock music to tell the story? Aren’t those things too worldly? But God uses whatever will get people’s attention. He contextualized the message so that it spoke to those he wanted to reach. Those astrologers wouldn’t have paid attention to an angel, but a star—that spoke to them. I wonder if, in this new year, we need to let go of our own prejudices, stop speaking in churchy language, and communicate the good news in whatever way we can so people can hear it. We don’t change the message, but the way we say it has to constantly be updated so the message can be heard in a new day.
A second thing this story tells is that the good news is, in fact, for everyone. The Jews in that day had believed that the savior was only coming for them, that the “Day of the Lord” (the end of the world) would be a time when they would be saved and everyone else would be judged. And so their faith, in those days, in many ways, had become very insular, very inward-focused. Even the message going to shepherds was pushing it, because shepherds were on the fringe. They were outcasts. But at least they were Jewish. Now this message goes to Gentiles, to pagans. They, too, are offered an opportunity to respond to the baby of Bethlehem. They, too, are given the chance to find salvation in him. It’s unthinkable! But aren’t we glad they were because if the message wasn’t given to Gentiles as well as Jews, most of us wouldn’t be here today. However, that wasn’t something even the early church grabbed onto easily. Jesus, when he preached and taught, had to emphasize that, and Peter, the lead disciple had to learn it again in Acts 10. Maybe you remember the story: Peter is hungry and while he’s waiting on his hosts to prepare lunch, God gives him a vision of a sheet that drops from heaven containing all sorts of animals Jewish people considered “unclean.” And a voice from heaven says, “Get up, Peter. Kill and eat.” Peter is aghast: “I have never eaten anything impure or unclean.” And the voice says, “Do not call anything impure that God has made clean.” And right after that, Peter is invited to come to a Gentile’s home to speak, and the first thing he says when he arrives is, “I’m not supposed to be here, but God has shown me that no one is unclean.” Some call that event Peter’s second conversion, but it’s only an echo of what God was already doing in extending hope and salvation to the Magi when Jesus was born. The good news, the Gospel, is open and available to absolutely everyone (cf. Bailey, Jesus Through Middle Eastern Eyes, pgs. 52-54).
Even Herod. Have you ever thought about that? Even paranoid, power-hungry Herod could have come and found the baby, the newborn king. But that would have required Herod to do something he wasn’t willing to do: to worship someone other than himself. Oh, he tells the Magi that’s what he wants to do. He gives them instructions: “Go and search carefully for the child. As soon as you find him, report to me, so that I too may go and worship him” (2:8). Now, because we know the rest of the story, we know Herod has no intention of worshipping the child, but what he proposes is exactly what the Magi do when they find Jesus. Matthew says, “On coming to the house, they saw the child with his mother Mary, and they bowed down and worshiped him” (2:11). It’s the same word Herod uses: proskuneo. You hear echoes of our word “prostrate” in that word, don’t you? To be prostrate means you’re laying flat on the ground, and that seems to be what the Magi did in order to show respect to the Christ child. Matthew says they “bowed down,” which means you go from a higher position to a lower one. Now, of course, we picture that in a physical sense; the Magi knelt down, maybe even lay down on the ground, and lowered their heads, and that’s probably at least part of what’s going on here. The image suggests someone paying homage to a royal figure rather than, necessarily, worshipping a god (Carson, “Matthew,” Expositor’s Bible Commentary, Vol. 8, pg. 86) and that was done by physically lowering yourself. But there’s more than just that physical gesture going on here. The image is that these learned men, these Magi, are recognizing that in this baby’s birth, something significant, something far more than they really understand at this point, is happening. They’ve traveled so far and so long. They’ve risked everything to see what new thing this God of the Jews might be doing.
And when they see it, even before they understand it all, they bow, they worship, they offer gifts. Their response should be ours as well. We who know this story so well, maybe too well, are still called to bow, to worship, and to give our gifts. We bow by recognizing that God is God and we are not. One of the things I love about the Church of the Nativity in Bethlehem, the church that stands over the traditional site of Jesus’ birth, is that, in order to get into the church, you have to bow. The way in is through the door of humility. It’s a small, narrow entrance and there are lot of stories as to how that door got to be so small, but today, if you want to go to the manger, you have to bow. It’s a reminder that this place is not about me or you or anyone else. It’s about the one who was born there. I sometimes wonder if we shouldn’t put doors of humility on the fronts of all of our churches. Of course, building inspectors would never allow that today, but perhaps we can keep that image in our mind as we come into the church. God is God and we are not. We bow.
And then we worship. “Worship” is an old word that literally means “giving worth to.” We “worship” whatever is most important in our lives. Many people worship money or power or sex or material possessions. Those of the gods of the age, and to worship Jesus is a radical, counter-cultural act. But worshipping Jesus has little to do with what songs we sing or what style we sing them in. Worshipping Jesus has little to do with what we wear or what our standing in society is. Worshipping Jesus has little to do with what building we use or what language we use. Worshipping Jesus simply means we put him first in every aspect of our lives. Worship is a lifestyle, a 24/7/365 way of living rather than just an hour out of our week. Certainly, corporate worship, such as we do here, is essential for our soul, but it’s only the beginning point. When we worship, we give worth to Jesus and that can and should happen anywhere and everywhere. We bow, and we worship.
And we give our gifts to Jesus. The Magi “opened their treasures and presented him with gifts of gold, frankincense and myrrh” (2:11). There are varying opinions as to the significance of these gifts. You’ve probably heard or gotten an e-mail about the gifts and what they represent. Some say the gold represents royalty and Jesus’ role as king, frankincense represents prayer as often such scents were burned during prayer, and myrrh is a bitter perfume used in burials and would then represent Jesus’ death for our salvation. In fact, that’s sort of the track the hymn takes. And I’m not saying there weren’t symbolic meanings in the gifts. After all, they’re expensive things to give but they were not uncommon gifts. Some scholars think that perhaps these gifts were sold to be able to finance the flight to Egypt Matthew describes in verse 14 (Carson 89). And all of that may be true, but there is also a more basic thing happening here. The Magi give what they have to honor a newborn king, to honor someone significant. They give appropriate gifts for a king (Wright 12). They didn’t just give what they had leftover, or grab something at the dollar store on their way out of Persia. They gave costly gifts that would honor this baby. Which brings up the question: what do we give to Jesus that costs us something? What do we give that isn’t just something we have leftover? What do we give that truly honors who Jesus is? The Magi set the standard; will we follow their example?
All of this—bowing, worshipping, giving—is set in a context of joy. Matthew says when the Magi knew they were headed in the right direction, when they were going to see the newborn king, “they were overjoyed” (2:10). In fact, Matthew wants to make sure we get the message, and so “overjoyed” really doesn’t convey what he says. He uses two words, two big words, to describe this kind of joy, so it’s sort of like he says: they were greatly full of the biggest joy you could ever have. Literally he says they had “exceedingly mega-joy.” That’s a whole lot of joy. It’s not just, “Oh, going to church is kind of cool.” No, this is joy that takes over a person’s soul. And the cool thing is—they didn’t even really know anything about Jesus yet. We, who do, should also be people who bow, who worship and who give with “great, mega-joy.”
Now, I know sometimes our lives are not happy. Sometimes there are circumstances we’re going through that are not ideal. But joy is different from happiness. Joy is the deep-down conviction that God is good and that God is on our side, and that no matter what happens to us, God will take care of us. Happiness is dependent upon our circumstances, but joy comes from deep down within. Joy comes from knowing that baby of Bethlehem. And yet, so often, we come to bow, to worship and to give and we act like it’s a chore, or like it’s the last thing we want to do, or like we’re only here because we couldn’t come up with anything else better this week to do. What if, in this new year that’s coming up, we adopted instead the attitude of the psalmist who said: “I rejoiced with those who said to me, ‘Let us go to the house of the Lord’” (Psalm 122:1). The Magi came to the baby Jesus with joy—overwhelming joy; so can we. No matter what our circumstances, the promise of the Scriptures is that he is Emmanuel, God with us, through every moment, through every circumstance, through every success and through every failure—Emmanuel, God with us, bringing us joy, bringing us hope, bringing us life. That is a reason for joy, not only at Christmas but every day of the year and every day of our lives. That is a reason to be overjoyed. Emmanuel—God with us. Thanks be to God! Amen.